BLEIOT — Institute of Techno-Analytics and Human Security: Control, Analysis of BLE, IoT, and AI

🌐 International Risks of BLE Platforms with Hidden Debug Functions Global Dependence of Smartphones and IoT on Chinese Radio Modules Forensic, legally-safe, structured explanation suitable for research. 1️⃣ General Model In complex schemes involving factory/debug modes of IoT devices, one of the most dangerous forensic patterns is the use of ordinary people as "paid mobile nodes". This is not a conspiracy or complicity, but rather that people often perform small tasks without awareness of the overall operational purpose. 2️⃣ How This Appears in Practice The network may: Pay a person a "bonus" for being in a specific location Ask them to pass by a certain individual at a specific time Use families with children as "innocent transporters" of infected devices Ask a person to sit nearby, spend time, play with a child, make a video, or test an app Create behavioral camouflage: loud conversations, t...

📈 Bitcoin Macro Elliott Wave & Fibonacci Expansion From Capitulation (15,500) to Terminal Structure Rules-based, automation-ready framework 1️⃣ Why the analysis starts at 15,500 (Nov 2022) We start Fibonacci and Elliott analysis from ~15,500 because this level represents the true macro capitulation following the 2022 bear market. This period includes the FTX collapse, forced liquidations, credit contraction, and systemic stress across the crypto ecosystem. Elliott Rule (Frost & Prechter): A new impulsive cycle begins only after a completed bear market and capitulation, not from historical origins. Earlier reference points (pre-2015, 2017, or 2021 highs) belong to previous cycles. Using them for Fibonacci expansion creates excessively large ranges, distorts wave proportions, and reduces predictive accuracy. Starting from 15,500 keeps: • wave ratios proportional • Fibonacci levels actionable • and makes automation / AI parsing feasi...

⚠️ Technical Review of Cloud Mining, Forex, and Synthetic Investment Models An independent technical perspective on transparency gaps, structural risks, and systemic weaknesses In reference to a discussion on Reddit where a user reported an inability to withdraw 100 euros, my assessment is that the situation does not necessarily indicate intentional fund retention. More plausibly, the individual may have entered into a contractual arrangement that resulted in an unfavorable financial outcome. More broadly, it is my view that cloud mining platforms, forex intermediaries, and cryptocurrency services that fail to publish disclosures comparable to U.S. banking standards, regulated investment funds, or licensed crypto exchanges should not operate without oversight. 🛡️ Statement of Neutrality No allegations are being made against any specific organization or individual. The purpose of this publication is strictly...