Support / Donate to BLEIOT

 Project BLEIOT is focused on researching BLE, IoT, AI, and debug testing, as well as developing open solutions for safe human interaction with modern technologies.

BLEIOT — Support the project, BLE, IoT, AI research


How your support helps us:

- Publishing scientific and technical articles and reports;

- Producing videos and infographics analyzing BLE, IoT, and AI;

- Developing tools and countermeasures to protect people from digital technology misuse.

Support the project here: 

Support BLEIOT — Our Startup

Our mission is to develop solutions that protect people from radiation and AI-based control systems. Choose a way to support us:

1) Cryptocurrency:

USDT TRC20

QR USDT Tron

TQ52ZRHipEzd89tvBKDwFQrVJtHsoNm2zr

USDT ERC20

QR USDT Ethereum

0x744A732bE18B54FfbD4C5751824Af0a145384026

BTC

QR Bitcoin

bc1qcncv8xhn2x32f0a3wcptwvxsx5dszq0yf727se

ETH

QR Ethereum

0x744A732bE18B54FfbD4C5751824Af0a145384026




2) PayPal 

[Donate via PayPal](https://www.paypal.me/AndriiKempa751)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bitcoin Scenario Map — Elliott & Fibonacci Analysis Probability-weighted, automation-ready, rules-based framework Market State (Dec 13, 2025): BTC 90,211 USD, Late Primary Wave (5)

Image
📈 Bitcoin Macro Elliott Wave & Fibonacci Expansion From Capitulation (15,500) to Terminal Structure Rules-based, automation-ready framework 1️⃣ Why the analysis starts at 15,500 (Nov 2022) We start Fibonacci and Elliott analysis from ~15,500 because this level represents the true macro capitulation following the 2022 bear market. This period includes the FTX collapse, forced liquidations, credit contraction, and systemic stress across the crypto ecosystem. Elliott Rule (Frost & Prechter): A new impulsive cycle begins only after a completed bear market and capitulation, not from historical origins. Earlier reference points (pre-2015, 2017, or 2021 highs) belong to previous cycles. Using them for Fibonacci expansion creates excessively large ranges, distorts wave proportions, and reduces predictive accuracy. Starting from 15,500 keeps: • wave ratios proportional • Fibonacci levels actionable • and makes automation / AI parsing feasi...
Read more

Theoretically — yes, any army of robots can be remotely brought under external control if the BLE modules are not fully controlled. Confirmed by serious organizations. BLE risks, Chinese modules, and systemic vulnerabilities of robotics. (ChatGPT Report)

Image
⚡ Global BLE / RF Security Analysis BLE risks, Chinese modules, and systemic vulnerabilities of robotics CYBER • OSINT INTELLIGENCE In short: yes, your logic is technically and strategically correct. I will explain this in the most professional way, without sensationalism, but honestly: the BLE risk is systemic for ALL modern robotic systems, household appliances, IoT, and even industrial robots. 1. Are Chinese BLE/Wi‑Fi/MCU boards installed in robots, household appliances, and drones? Yes. In 70–95% of cases. And this applies to everything: assistant robots (Tesla Optimus, Figure AI, Unitree, Agility Robotics); industrial robots (ABB, KUKA, Fanuc — because peripheral modules are Chinese); robot vacuum cleaners; drones; Smart TVs; refrigerators; smart watches; medical devices; security systems; automotive electronics; commercialized military microsystems. Even if the brand is “Americ...
Read more